Sourced · Weighted · Un-buyable

The credible grade for the data-center fight.

Search any US data-center project, operator, or contractor. Every data point carries its source.

Projects tracked
States covered
In active review

How GridWatcher Grades

Opacity is a grade — not a gap we hide.

We take no political side. A project is transparent or it isn’t; a state lets the public see what’s being built on its grid, or it doesn’t. GridWatcher measures that — it doesn’t argue it.

Avg. Disclosure Completeness

Projects Graded

A-Eligible on Disclosure

enough pillars disclosed to earn a top grade — if the record supports it.

Why no A’s yet — and why that’s the point.

Each project is graded on up to 8 public-record pillars: grid, energy, water, environment, economic, governance, jobs, and sovereignty. When a pillar has no public data, it scores “Insufficient Disclosure” — honestly dark, never invented. A project can only reach an A when enough pillars are disclosed AND the disclosed record is strong. Today the strongest project scores in the B range: the data centers we grade are being built faster than they’re being disclosed. That gap is the finding.

GridDisclosed
EnergyInsufficient
WaterDisclosed
EnvironmentInsufficient
EconomicDisclosed
GovernanceInsufficient
JobsDisclosed
SovereigntyInsufficient

Latest report cards

Every grade is sourced. GridWatcher accepts no money from rated companies. © GridWatcher LLC.